inside me a lunatic sings

~ Saturday, January 21 ~
Permalink
pantslessprogressive:

“The glorification of the corporation over the past thirty years has been predicated in large part on the myth that corporations are solely dedicated to maximizing shareholder value. But corporations only maximize shareholder value if shareholders have a way to keep executives and employees in line and prevent them from simply lining their own pockets. Decades of research have shown numerous failings in the standard corporate governance model: boards that are stuffed with cronies of the CEO, directors who have no ability to evaluate what their companies are actually doing, massive golden parachutes that insulate CEOs against failure, and so on. Poor oversight of political activity may be another to add to the list.
There is much work still to be done on corporate political activity and its implications for shareholders. But the early evidence is that we cannot simply assume, as the Supreme Court did in Citizens United, that shareholder pressure will magically ensure that a company’s political spending is always in its best interests. In this context, the need for improved disclosure is even more urgent.” - James Kwak
Citizens United Turns 2—and It’s Still Wrong
Never read the case? Start here.
[Photo: Mike Luckovich]

pantslessprogressive:

“The glorification of the corporation over the past thirty years has been predicated in large part on the myth that corporations are solely dedicated to maximizing shareholder value. But corporations only maximize shareholder value if shareholders have a way to keep executives and employees in line and prevent them from simply lining their own pockets. Decades of research have shown numerous failings in the standard corporate governance model: boards that are stuffed with cronies of the CEO, directors who have no ability to evaluate what their companies are actually doing, massive golden parachutes that insulate CEOs against failure, and so on. Poor oversight of political activity may be another to add to the list.

There is much work still to be done on corporate political activity and its implications for shareholders. But the early evidence is that we cannot simply assume, as the Supreme Court did in Citizens United, that shareholder pressure will magically ensure that a company’s political spending is always in its best interests. In this context, the need for improved disclosure is even more urgent.” - James Kwak

Citizens United Turns 2—and It’s Still Wrong

Never read the case? Start here.

[Photo: Mike Luckovich]


129 notes
  1. speaksoftlyandcarrybigstick reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  2. bananacupcakes reblogged this from think4yourself
  3. nocomfortinreality reblogged this from quotingthecrisis
  4. allbecauseican reblogged this from occupyonline
  5. aevan reblogged this from quotingthecrisis
  6. b1atchhh reblogged this from quotingthecrisis
  7. quotingthecrisis reblogged this from think4yourself
  8. vegangarbage reblogged this from pieceinthepuzzlehumanity
  9. occupyingyourpolitics reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  10. jjarichardson reblogged this from myheadisweak
  11. chills552 reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  12. think4yourself reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  13. sans-nuage reblogged this from shanksinatra
  14. shineshinesunshine reblogged this from randomactsofchaos
  15. emocatfish reblogged this from brittaniarainwater127
  16. awkwardlyconfused reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  17. wareq reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  18. theambiguousalien reblogged this from occupyonline
  19. squirrelman963 reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  20. wheredidcarlosgo reblogged this from shanksinatra
  21. onesmallstepformankind reblogged this from occupyonline
  22. currentmusings reblogged this from pantslessprogressive
  23. shanksinatra reblogged this from mamawolfcat
reblogged via pantslessprogressive